Luton 01582 725311
Milton Keynes 01908 304560
Harpenden 01582 715234
Call Us 0330 0945 500

For Unmarried Couples

The law governing property is found scattered throughout legislation and also case law, which means that individual case outcomes can lead to considerable revisions of the legal position for an unmarried couple owning a property together.

Settling property and financial matters for unmarried couples

Each of the matters referred to below can prove expensive to litigate. This is because the law is so uncertain and is not really designed to address the needs of couples and their offspring in an unmarried relationship. Various attempts have been made to secure changes in the law but these have generally been defeated by the public policy position which provides that if people wish to have the protection of the laws which govern marriage, they can get married. 

Therefore, it is advisable for cohabiting couples to draw up legally binding agreements in the form of trust deeds or cohabitation agreements that record their intentions during their cohabitation and in the event of a separation. Where parties have failed to enter into such agreements, they should enter into separation agreements in the event of a breakdown in the relationship so that their intentions are clear. This can avoid a lot of expensive litigation.

Pensions

Cohabiting couples do not have any entitlement to make claims on the pension of their partner.  In the event of a death, they may be able to satisfy the pension Trustees that they have some entitlement under the pension as a dependant or family member but they will not be entitled to a widow or widower’s payment. Recognition of their claim will be entirely at the discretion of the pension trustees. The courts have no role in this matter and cohabitees can't make an application to the court requiring receipt of a share in a pension that is not in payment.

Property

Where properties are jointly owned decisions will depend on the legal agreements entered into by the couple. Therefore if a cohabiting couple purchases a house together each signing the Transfer Deed as purchasers, having made no attempt to define their shares, it will be assumed that they are each entitled to 50% of the equity in the property. As a result of a key case, the Court will also consider the post-separation conduct of the parties in an effort to establish whether there was an implicit change in the legal agreement.

It is not usually possible to prevent a sale of a jointly owned property although it is not unusual to find that one owner refuses to sell and it is then necessary for the other owner to apply to the court for an order for sale. This is an expensive and laborious process but is sometimes the only option available in the face of an intransigent joint owner.

Where there are children of the family under the age of 18 one joint owner may be able to establish that he or she should remain in the property during the children’s minority - up to the age of 18. In that case, the person who is allowed to stay living with the children will usually be required to return to the other joint owner his or her equity in the property when the youngest child reaches the age of 18. This can put off a difficult housing decision for one of the parties who may find it more difficult to obtain a mortgage when their youngest child is 18 but deprives the other owner of their share in the capital. It can resolve immediate problems of the housing at least for the children and their primary carer.

Read our Case Study on Unmarried Couples and Property Disputes by clicking on the blue box on the right-hand side.

Capital

The initial assumption in respect of capital (for example money in the bank, the interest in insurance policies or other investments) is that those assets belong to the person in whose name they are held.  It can be possible to establish that such funds were held on trust for the other party.  Trust law is potentially an expensive and difficult area of law.

Maintenance

Under Schedule 1 of the Children Act the parent who remains in occupation of a property until their youngest child reaches the age of 18 may be able to claim income to support that residence.

A court will only award maintenance if the other partner can afford to pay it. This, therefore, involves a careful means assessment of each party’s income and outgoings and financial needs and resources generally.

It is not possible for couples who do not have dependent children to claim maintenance no matter what their personal circumstances.

Child maintenance

The courts no longer (generally) deal with child maintenance. There are some exceptions to this rule. The parent who has day to day care of the children (or the parent who receives the Child Benefit) may apply to the Child Maintenance Service for child support.

Inheritance

Under the provisions of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1976 it is possible for members of the deceased’s family or his/her dependants to make a claim against his or her Estate if the deceased fails to make adequate provision for the surviving family member or dependent.  Such claims must be lodged with the Court within six months of the Grant of Probate.

How we can help

This can be a complex area of law, so please get in touch with the family law team for advice. Call 0330 0945 500, email family@nevesllp.co.uk or complete our Contact Form and we'll get back to you.

For Unmarried Couples

Need Advice on a Family Matter?

5/5 Star review
Neves recently undertook our conveyancing and did an excellent job; the communication from Charlene Shillingford and her team throughout the whole process was top notch - I don’t recall being kept so up to date during the selling and buying of a house before. Queries were handled quickly and with the minimum of fuss, even when ‘the other side’ were being ‘difficult’. I’ve no reservation in recommending Neves. My heartfelt thanks to Charlene and the conveyancing team for their diligence and care during what can be a fraught time.
5/5 Star review
Beth Woodward, I wanted to say thank you for supporting me on my recent divorce. Faced with one of the most aggressive and unpleasant legal firms in London, you led me through both the family and financial divorce courts and more than achieved every one of my goals for the divorce. Most importantly, I have equal time parenting with my two girls and a really fair settlement so I can support them financially, both not even remotely offered by the other side. You listened and supported me when I really went for it, kept me sane through the FDR and court visits and also gave me the tough messages when I need to hear it. Thank you, I can’t quite explain how we did it, but we did 😊 😊 😊 😊
5/5 Star review
Emily has supported me through a divorce with excellent advice and guidance at every stage. All issues and options were explained clearly and fully. Possible outcomes were fully outlined to me throughout the process. Emily's professionalism has been of the highest standard. The kind and understanding manner in which Emily has supported me at all stages of the process is something that I am extremely grateful for. I literally felt the pressure shift from my shoulders. This is why I give 5 stars for the assistance I received.
5/5 Star review
I left this review for a few months as I wanted to let everything settle down and get my own head space back. On behalf of myself and my family, I just wanted to express our heart felt thanks to Beth for navigating us through a difficult divorce and parenting matters. Perhaps a little unconventional because as a dad, my teenage daughter wanted to remain living with me and yet I was also the main earner. We trusted Beth to give us timely, clear and succinct advice, help challenge tactics from the other side and understand the needs of my daughter whilst protecting my independent assets. We are so pleased with the outcome of the issues and all of the initial objectives were met. Beth, the whole of my family (children and grandchildren too) cannot thank you and your team enough. We have our home and family life back, fun and normality have resumed and a lunatic puppy is in place to help us heal and grow. Having trust in professional people is crucial at such a difficult time in life, and feeling that you have a solicitor of such high calibre took some pressure away when it was hard to deal with everything else. There were times that I felt Beth carried me through the process and times where I almost asked you to make decisions for me. It is a messy process, people get hurt and tears flow but thank you for your professionalism and understanding.
5/5 Star review
Neves were fantastic with my shared ownership purchase. What I particularly liked is their attention to detail ensuring my interests were protected, sound and trustworthy advice. Thank you to Charlene and Jackie who provided exceptional service. I have already recommended Neves to my friends and family.
Beth Woodward
Partner and Head of Divorce and Family Law
Heidi Fleming
Senior Associate - Divorce and Family Law
Tina Shah
Senior Associate - Divorce and Family Law
Emily Pope
Associate - Divorce and Family Law
Back to top